Budgetary analysis of the repair and comprehensive health care program 2006–2022
Abstract
In this exploratory study on the Comprehensive Health Repair and Care Program (PRAIS), an analysis of the budget allocated in the period 2006- 2022 by the Budget Directorate for the program and the Undersecretary of Assistance Networks of the Ministry of Health (MINSAL) is developed, on which it depends. This to carry out a sectoral analysis of the budget. The importance of this analysis lies in the low amount of research related to PRAIS, even though this, from the international literature, has been cataloged as a successful case of reparation in the context of post-conflict societies. The findings made confirm the incrementalist nature of the public budget and a null critical analysis with a Human Rights perspective on the subject.Keywords:
Public Policies, Budget Analysis, Human RightsReferences
ACNUDH; IBP. (2017). Haciendo realidad los derechos humanos a través de los presupuestos guberna- mentales. Ginebra, Suiza: ONU.
Balakrishnan, R., Heintz, J. y Elson, D. (2016). Rethinking Economic Policy for Social Justice: The radical potential of human rights. New York, USA: Routledge.
Borzutzky, S. (2017). Human Rights Policies in Chile: The Unfinished Struggle for Truth and Justice.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buchanan, J. y Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Buchanan, J. y Tullock, G. (1977). The Expanding Public Sector. Public Choice, pp. 147–150.
Congreso Nacional. (2004). Ley 19.980. Valparaíso: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.
Dávila, M. (2020). Presidencialismo a la chilena. Coaliciones y cooperación política, 1990–2018.
Santiago de Chile: Universitaria.
Ffrench-Davis, R. (2018). Reformas Económicas en Chile. 1973–2017. Santiago de Chile: Taurus.
Jorquera, M., Madariaga, C., Burrone, M., Tapia, E., Colantonio, L. y Alvarado, R. (2020). Estudio descriptivo de mortalidad en sobrevivientes de tortura y prisión política en el periodo de la dictadura militar en Chile, 1973–1990. Revista Médica de Chile, pp. 1773–1780.
Le Maux, B. y Zhang, W. (2013). Does political fragmentation lead to budgetary incrementalism? An empirical test on the French local public sector. Papers in Regional Science, pp. 535–555.
Lindblom, C. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 79-88. Lira, E. y Loveman, B. (2005). Políticas de Reparación. Chile 1990–2004. Santiago de Chile: LOM. Martner, G. (2004). Planificación y presupuesto por programas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI. Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Profesional Coordinación Nacional PRAIS, 1 (21 de Octubre de 2021). Entrevista 21 de Octubre 2021 (R. Rivera, Entrevistador).
Segovia, A. (2006). Financing reparations programs: reflections from international experience. En
P. d. Greiff, The Handbook of reparations (pp. 650–675). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Little, Brown: Boston, Massachusetts. Wise, L. R. (2004). Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucrati Behavior. Public Administration Review, pp. 669–680.
Twitter